WebRTC vs Red5
A head-to-head comparison of WebRTC and Red5, And what features and value does VideoSDK offer?
WebRTC
is a free and open-source initiative that empowers web browsers with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities through straightforward JavaScript APIs. The WebRTC components have been finely tuned to effectively fulfill this objective.
Red5 is a free and open-source media server that enables real-time streaming of video and audio over the internet. It is a flexible platform that can be used to build a wide variety of streaming applications on demand. However, RED5 is expensive to run for large-scale streaming due to high computing resource requirements and lack of pre-built applications.
How VideoSDK make a difference?
WebRTC and red5 are both powerful technologies, but they have different strengths and applications. WebRTC is an open-source project that enables real-time communication directly within web browsers while red5 excels in handling streaming and real-time communication. It's important to consider their limitations when choosing between WebRTC and red5.
Introducing VideoSDK- a powerful and easy-to-use video conferencing SDK that offers a wide range of features, including chat, polls, breakout rooms, streaming capability, and RTMP out. It is the perfect solution for businesses and organizations of all sizes that need to create high-quality and engaging real-time communication experiences.
Here is a comparison of Video SDK with WebRTC and Red5, and understand why Video SDK is a much better choice for all your needs.
Features Comparison : WebRTC vs Red5 vs VideoSDK
features | WebRTC | Red5 | VideoSDK |
|---|---|---|---|
No. of Participants (Including Hosts) | ✕ WebRTC supports 2-3 participants only. | ✕ Upto 250 Participants | ✓ VideoSDK supports upto Million Participants |
Ease of SDK Integration | ✕ WebRTC SDK is Complex for integration. | ✕ Complex Integration | ✓ VideoSDK requires less than 2 weeks for SDK integration |
Adpative Audio/Video Quality | ✓ WebRTC offers adaptive audio/video quality | ✓ Available | ✓ VideoSDK provides best adaptive audio/video quality. |
Works behind the Firewall/Private-Network | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Role Management, Permissions, Policy and Templates | ✕ WebRTC has limited Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates. | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK offers Role management, Permissions, Policy and Templates |
Automatic video and audio track degrade due to bandwidth in-consistency | ✕ No | ✕ Not Available | ✓ Available |
Dynamic Layout for Studio and RTMP Live Streaming | ✕ No | ✕ Not Available | ✓ Available (No need for manual config.) |
Build collaborative features like chat, poll, Q & A, whiteboard etc. | ✕ In WebRTC collaborative features is not available. | ✕ Not Available | ✓ VideoSDK offers a range of collaborative features |
Virtual Background, Live Transcription & ML Middleware | ✕ No | ✕ Not Available | ✓ Easy Integration |
Webhooks | ✓ Yes | ✓ Available | ✓ Available |
Pricing Model | NA | Subscription Based | ✓ Pay-as-You-Go Plan |
Interactive Live Streaming | NA | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK supports Interactive Live Streaming |
Cloud Recording | NA | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offers Cloud Recording Capabilities |
Interactive Whiteboard | ✕ WebRTC not provides an interactive whiteboard feature. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK provides Interactive Whiteboard Feature |
Multi-platform | ✓ WebRTC supports multiple platforms for a wider reach. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK compatible with Multi-Platforms for greater reach |
Interactive Participant Support | ✕ WebRTC support limited Interactive Participants. | ✕ Upto 1000 | ✓ Upto 5,000 |
Mobile Browser Support | ✕ 20% | Limited (25%) | ✓ Video support 91% mobile browsers |
Automatic Audio/Video Degrade, Re-connectivity | ✓ WebRTC supports automatic audio/video quality adjustments.. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK supports Reconnectivity with Audio/Video Quality adjustments.. |
Audio & Video powered by AI | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Independent of Open Source Dependency | ✓ WebRTC is dependent on open source. | ✕ No | ✕ VideoSDK is not dependent on open source. |
Customised RTMP, Cloud Recording, HLS | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API for Specific Features (Collaborative Games, Polls, etc.) | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
API for Social Features (Merging Rooms, Battles, Coins, Gifts Sending etc.) | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Full HD Recording | ✕ WebRTC not supports full HD recording. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK supports full HD recording |
Open Source Templates | ✓ WebRTC heavily rely on open source templates. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK rely on open source templates |
Full Custom roles | ✕ Limited | No | ✓ VideoSDK offer support for full custom roles |
HLS Streaming | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK supports HLS streaming |
Cost-effective | ✓ WebRTC is cost effective. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK is Cost Effective |
Prebuilt SDK | ✕ WebRTC not provides prebuilt SDKs for easier integration. | Separate SDK | ✓ VideoSDK provides Prebuilt SDKs for easier integration |
Fully Customizable UI | ✕ Yes, but requires much efforts | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK allows for Limited customizable UI |
Metaverse Platform Support | ✓ WebRTC support Metaverse platform. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK support Metaverse platform |
Legacy Solution | ✓ Yes | ✓ No | |
Session Analytics | ✕ WebRTC not offer session analytics option. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer session analytics option |
Data Tracks | ✕ WebRTC not offer track data option. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer track data option |
features | WebRTC | Red5 | VideoSDK |
|---|---|---|---|
No. of Participants (Including Hosts) | ✕ WebRTC supports 2-3 participants only. | ✕ Upto 250 Participants | ✓ VideoSDK supports upto Million Participants |
Ease of SDK Integration | ✕ WebRTC SDK is Complex for integration. | ✕ Complex Integration | ✓ VideoSDK requires less than 2 weeks for SDK integration |
Adpative Audio/Video Quality | ✓ WebRTC offers adaptive audio/video quality | ✓ Available | ✓ VideoSDK provides best adaptive audio/video quality. |
Works behind the Firewall/Private-Network | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Role Management, Permissions, Policy and Templates | ✕ WebRTC has limited Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates. | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK offers Role management, Permissions, Policy and Templates |
Automatic video and audio track degrade due to bandwidth in-consistency | ✕ No | ✕ Not Available | ✓ Available |
Dynamic Layout for Studio and RTMP Live Streaming | ✕ No | ✕ Not Available | ✓ Available (No need for manual config.) |
Build collaborative features like chat, poll, Q & A, whiteboard etc. | ✕ In WebRTC collaborative features is not available. | ✕ Not Available | ✓ VideoSDK offers a range of collaborative features |
Virtual Background, Live Transcription & ML Middleware | ✕ No | ✕ Not Available | ✓ Easy Integration |
Webhooks | ✓ Yes | ✓ Available | ✓ Available |
Pricing Model | NA | Subscription Based | ✓ Pay-as-You-Go Plan |
Interactive Live Streaming | NA | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK supports Interactive Live Streaming |
Cloud Recording | NA | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offers Cloud Recording Capabilities |
Interactive Whiteboard | ✕ WebRTC not provides an interactive whiteboard feature. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK provides Interactive Whiteboard Feature |
Multi-platform | ✓ WebRTC supports multiple platforms for a wider reach. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK compatible with Multi-Platforms for greater reach |
Interactive Participant Support | ✕ WebRTC support limited Interactive Participants. | ✕ Upto 1000 | ✓ Upto 5,000 |
Mobile Browser Support | ✕ 20% | Limited (25%) | ✓ Video support 91% mobile browsers |
Automatic Audio/Video Degrade, Re-connectivity | ✓ WebRTC supports automatic audio/video quality adjustments.. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK supports Reconnectivity with Audio/Video Quality adjustments.. |
Audio & Video powered by AI | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Independent of Open Source Dependency | ✓ WebRTC is dependent on open source. | ✕ No | ✕ VideoSDK is not dependent on open source. |
Customised RTMP, Cloud Recording, HLS | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API for Specific Features (Collaborative Games, Polls, etc.) | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
API for Social Features (Merging Rooms, Battles, Coins, Gifts Sending etc.) | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Full HD Recording | ✕ WebRTC not supports full HD recording. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK supports full HD recording |
Open Source Templates | ✓ WebRTC heavily rely on open source templates. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK rely on open source templates |
Full Custom roles | ✕ Limited | No | ✓ VideoSDK offer support for full custom roles |
HLS Streaming | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK supports HLS streaming |
Cost-effective | ✓ WebRTC is cost effective. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK is Cost Effective |
Prebuilt SDK | ✕ WebRTC not provides prebuilt SDKs for easier integration. | Separate SDK | ✓ VideoSDK provides Prebuilt SDKs for easier integration |
Fully Customizable UI | ✕ Yes, but requires much efforts | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK allows for Limited customizable UI |
Metaverse Platform Support | ✓ WebRTC support Metaverse platform. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK support Metaverse platform |
Legacy Solution | ✓ Yes | ✓ No | |
Session Analytics | ✕ WebRTC not offer session analytics option. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer session analytics option |
Data Tracks | ✕ WebRTC not offer track data option. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer track data option |
Price Comparison : WebRTC vs Red5 vs VideoSDK
features | WebRTC | Red5 | VideoSDK |
|---|---|---|---|
Volume Discount | NA | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer the Volume Discount |
Video Conferencing | NA | Developer Pro: $29.99 per month
Small- to medium-sized companies: $7,500 per year
Enterprise services: $57,000
High volume: Custom pricing
Startup Pro: $109 |
|
Analytics | NA | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer Free Analytics with Dashboard |
Separate Pricing for Video and Audio | NA | ✓ No | ✓ Yes |
Free 10,000 Minutes Every Month | NA | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Minimum Price for Video Calls | NA | Not Available | $0.002 per participant minutes |
Minimum Price for Audio-only Calls | NA | Not Available | $0.0006 per participant minutes |
Advanced Firewall Control | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer Free Firewall Control |
Compliance & Privacy | ✕ WebRTC not provides compliance & privacy support. | ✕ Red5 not provides compliance & privacy support. | ✓ Provide Compliance Standards and Privacy Regulations:
|
Cloud Recording Pricing | NA | On $3,399 per month Plan |
|
RTMP Pricing | NA | On $3,399 per month Plan |
|
ILS Pricing | NA | Basic live streaming: $29.99 per month
Growth Pro: $89 per year or $99 per month
Bulk discounts: Available for large enterprise installations" |
|
Storage Pricing | NA | Developer Pro: $29.99 per month
Small- to medium-sized companies: $7,500 per year
Enterprise services: $57,000
High volume: Custom pricing
Startup Pro: $109 |
|
features | WebRTC | Red5 | VideoSDK |
|---|---|---|---|
Volume Discount | NA | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer the Volume Discount |
Video Conferencing | NA | Developer Pro: $29.99 per month
Small- to medium-sized companies: $7,500 per year
Enterprise services: $57,000
High volume: Custom pricing
Startup Pro: $109 |
|
Analytics | NA | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer Free Analytics with Dashboard |
Separate Pricing for Video and Audio | NA | ✓ No | ✓ Yes |
Free 10,000 Minutes Every Month | NA | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Minimum Price for Video Calls | NA | Not Available | $0.002 per participant minutes |
Minimum Price for Audio-only Calls | NA | Not Available | $0.0006 per participant minutes |
Advanced Firewall Control | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer Free Firewall Control |
Compliance & Privacy | ✕ WebRTC not provides compliance & privacy support. | ✕ Red5 not provides compliance & privacy support. | ✓ Provide Compliance Standards and Privacy Regulations:
|
Cloud Recording Pricing | NA | On $3,399 per month Plan |
|
RTMP Pricing | NA | On $3,399 per month Plan |
|
ILS Pricing | NA | Basic live streaming: $29.99 per month
Growth Pro: $89 per year or $99 per month
Bulk discounts: Available for large enterprise installations" |
|
Storage Pricing | NA | Developer Pro: $29.99 per month
Small- to medium-sized companies: $7,500 per year
Enterprise services: $57,000
High volume: Custom pricing
Startup Pro: $109 |
|
Support Comparison : WebRTC vs Red5 vs Video SDK
features | WebRTC | Red5 | VideoSDK |
|---|---|---|---|
Support | NA | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Cost | NA | Basic live streaming: $29.99 per month
Growth Pro: $89 per year or $99 per month
Small- to medium-sized companies: $7,500 per year
Enterprise services: $57,000 per year
High volume: Custom pricing | Free |
Access to Testing | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ All paid accounts get access to testing support from Video SDK |
Access to TAM / CS Engineer | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Dedicated CS & Solution Engineers |
SLAs | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Affordable SLA with 99.9% Uptime |
features | WebRTC | Red5 | VideoSDK |
|---|---|---|---|
Support | NA | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Cost | NA | Basic live streaming: $29.99 per month
Growth Pro: $89 per year or $99 per month
Small- to medium-sized companies: $7,500 per year
Enterprise services: $57,000 per year
High volume: Custom pricing | Free |
Access to Testing | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ All paid accounts get access to testing support from Video SDK |
Access to TAM / CS Engineer | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Dedicated CS & Solution Engineers |
SLAs | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Affordable SLA with 99.9% Uptime |
Discover why Video SDK is the top choice for customers
“VideoSDK's well-structured product and efficient support team expedited integration. Their excellent user experience and well-defined documentation prompted us to switch from our previous provider.”
Kanishk Agrawal ,
Sr. Director - Technology at Judge Group
FAQ
