WebRTC vs Jitsi
How do WebRTC and Jitsi compare? And what does Video SDK offer?
Jitsi
is a free and open-source platform that simplifies video conferencing. It offers a user-friendly experience without the need for downloads or plugins, making it an excellent option for those seeking a straightforward live video solution without significant investment.WebRTC
is a free and open-source initiative that empowers web browsers with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities through straightforward JavaScript APIs. The WebRTC components have been finely tuned to effectively fulfill this objective.How Video SDK make a difference
Real-time communication has become integral to various industries, from online meetings and virtual conferences to healthcare and gaming. WebRTC (Web Real-Time Communication) and Jitsi are two prominent players in this space, each offering unique advantages and disadvantages.
However, Video SDK introduces a transformative factor. But what makes it stand out? This page conducts a comprehensive comparison between WebRTC and Jitsi, unveiling the aspects that contribute to Video SDK's exceptional performance. An ideal solution tailored to meet your specific requirements!
Features comparison : WebRTC vs Jitsi vs Video SDK
features | Jitsi | WebRTC | VideoSDK |
---|---|---|---|
No. of Participants (Including Hosts) | β Jitsi Meet supports limited participants. | β WebRTC supports 2-3 participants only. | β VideoSDK supports upto Million Participants |
Ease of SDK Integration | β Requires high coding effort | β WebRTC SDK is Complex for integration. | β VideoSDK requires less than 2 weeks for SDK integration |
Adpative Audio/Video Quality | β Jitsi Meet not offers adaptive audio/video quality. | β WebRTC offers adaptive audio/video quality | β VideoSDK provides best adaptive audio/video quality. |
Works behind the Firewall/Private-Network | β No | β No | β Yes |
Role Management, Permissions, Policy and Templates | β Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates are limited in Jitsi Meet. | β WebRTC has limited Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates. | β VideoSDK offers Role management, Permissions, Policy and Templates |
Automatic video and audio track degrade due to bandwidth in-consistency | β Not available | β No | β Available |
Dynamic Layout for Studio and RTMP Live Streaming | β Manual configuration needed | β No | β Available (No need for manual config.) |
Build collaborative features like chat, poll, Q & A, whiteboard etc. | β Complex integration | β In WebRTC collaborative features is not available. | β VideoSDK offers a range of collaborative features |
Virtual Background, Live Transcription & ML Middleware | β Yes | β No | β Easy Integration |
Webhooks | β Yes | β Yes | β Available |
Pricing Model | NA | NA | β Pay-as-You-Go Plan |
Interactive Live Streaming | NA | NA | β VideoSDK supports Interactive Live Streaming |
Cloud Recording | β Jitsi Meet not offers cloud recording capabilities. | NA | β VideoSDK offers Cloud Recording Capabilities |
Interactive Whiteboard | β Jitsi Meet not provides an interactive whiteboard feature. | β WebRTC not provides an interactive whiteboard feature. | β VideoSDK provides Interactive Whiteboard Feature |
Multi-platform | β Jitsi Meet not supports multiple platforms for a wider reach | β WebRTC supports multiple platforms for a wider reach. | β VideoSDK compatible with Multi-Platforms for greater reach |
Interactive Participant Support | β Jitsi Meet provides limited support for interactive participants. | β WebRTC support limited Interactive Participants. | β Upto 5,000 |
Mobile Browser Support | β Jitsi Meet offers limited support for mobile browsers. | β 20% | β Video support 91% mobile browsers |
Automatic Audio/Video Degrade, Re-connectivity | β Jitsi Meet not supports automatic audio/video quality adjustments. | β WebRTC supports automatic audio/video quality adjustments.. | β VideoSDK supports Reconnectivity with Audio/Video Quality adjustments.. |
Audio & Video powered by AI | β No | β No | β Yes |
Independent of Open Source Dependency | β Jitsi Meet is not dependent on open source. | β WebRTC is dependent on open source. | β VideoSDK is not dependent on open source. |
Customised RTMP, Cloud Recording, HLS | β No | β No | β Yes |
API for Specific Features (Collaborative Games, Polls, etc.) | β No | β No | β Yes |
API for Social Features (Merging Rooms, Battles, Coins, Gifts Sending etc.) | β No | β No | β Yes |
Full HD Recording | β Jitsi Meet supports full HD recording. | β WebRTC not supports full HD recording. | β VideoSDK supports full HD recording |
Open Source Templates | β Jitsi Meet not heavily rely on open source templates. | β WebRTC heavily rely on open source templates. | β VideoSDK rely on open source templates |
Full Custom roles | β Limited to host & participant roles | β Limited | β VideoSDK offer support for full custom roles |
HLS Streaming | β Jitsi supports HLS streaming. | β Yes | β VideoSDK supports HLS streaming |
Cost-effective | β Jitsi Meet is cost effective. | β WebRTC is cost effective. | β VideoSDK is Cost Effective |
Prebuilt SDK | β Jitsi Meet not provides prebuilt SDKs for easier integration. | β WebRTC not provides prebuilt SDKs for easier integration. | β VideoSDK provides Prebuilt SDKs for easier integration |
Fully Customizable UI | β Jitsi Meet not allows for a customizable UI. | β Yes, but requires much efforts | β VideoSDK allows for Limited customizable UI |
Metaverse Platform Support | β Jitsi Meet not support Metaverse platform. | β WebRTC support Metaverse platform. | β VideoSDK support Metaverse platform |
Session Analytics | β Jitsi Meet offer limited analytics option. | β WebRTC not offer session analytics option. | β VideoSDK offer session analytics option |
Data Tracks | β Jitsi Meet offer limited data tracks option. | β WebRTC not offer track data option. | β VideoSDK offer track data option |
Cost comparison : WebRTC vs Jitsi vs Video SDK
features | Jitsi | WebRTC | VideoSDK |
---|---|---|---|
Volume Discount | NA | NA | β VideoSDK offer the Volume Discount |
Video Conferencing | NA | NA |
|
Analytics | β No | NA | β VideoSDK offer Free Analytics with Dashboard |
Separate Pricing for Video and Audio | NA | NA | β Yes |
Free 10,000 Minutes Every Month | NA | NA | β Yes |
Minimum Price for Video Calls | NA | NA | $0.002 per participant minutes |
Minimum Price for Audio-only Calls | NA | NA | $0.0006 per participant minutes |
Advanced Firewall Control | β No | β No | β VideoSDK offer Free Firewall Control |
Compliance & Privacy | β Jitsi not provides compliance & privacy support. | β WebRTC not provides compliance & privacy support. | β Provide Compliance Standards and Privacy Regulations:
|
Cloud Recording Pricing | NA | NA |
|
RTMP Pricing | NA | NA |
|
ILS Pricing | NA | NA |
|
Storage Pricing | NA | NA |
|
Support comparison : WebRTC vs Jitsi vs Video SDK
features | Jitsi | WebRTC | VideoSDK |
---|---|---|---|
Support | β No | NA | β Yes |
Cost | NA | NA | Free |
Access to Testing | β No | β No | β All paid accounts get access to testing support from Video SDK |
Access to TAM / CS Engineer | β No | β No | β Dedicated CS & Solution Engineers |
SLAs | β No | β No | β Affordable SLA with 99.9% Uptime |
See why customers love Video SDK

βVideoSDK's well-structured product and efficient support team expedited integration. Their excellent user experience and well-defined documentation prompted us to switch from our previous provider.β
Kanishk Agrawal ,
Sr. Director - Technology at Judge Group
FAQ